Assessment is a stage, not an integration
Author a challenge in the studio, attach it to a pipeline stage, and it sends, scores and advances by itself. No webhook to babysit, no second login, no scores living in someone else's dashboard.
Everyone else sells you an ATS, then an assessment vendor, then an AI feature bolted on top of both. CodeScreen was built the other way round: challenges live in the pipeline, and the scoring reads the actual submissions and scorecards underneath it. Send a challenge, auto-score it, advance the stage.
Pre-launch · onboarding 3–5 design partners now
A ten-person team pays roughly $900–1,400 a month for those five. CodeScreen starts at $490.
Author a challenge in the studio, attach it to a pipeline stage, and it sends, scores and advances by itself. No webhook to babysit, no second login, no scores living in someone else's dashboard.
A deterministic match score you can reproduce, plus a written summary that may only cite real records. Every claim links back to the scorecard or the submission behind it. Because it sits on your pipeline rather than beside it, there's nothing left to infer from thin air.
An unsupervised take-home now measures which model a candidate subscribes to. Interviewer-gated live coding is the honest answer, and it's the format we build for first.
Unlimited on every paid plan, permanently. Per-attempt pricing quietly teaches teams to screen fewer people — which is the opposite of what a screening tool is for.
The product is already deep. What follows is what's built and running today — not a roadmap.
Custom stages per job, candidate records, notes, sequences and automations that move people without anyone remembering to.
Draft quizzes and coding challenges across multiple languages from a job description in seconds, then edit what you keep. Everything lands in a reusable library.
A real editor the interviewer sits in with the candidate, tied to the stage and archived against the record afterwards.
Book the loop, collect structured feedback on custom forms, and chase whoever hasn't submitted — per interviewer, not by group email.
Build the offer, track acceptance, and — for agencies — the placement and commission that follow it.
Funnel and time-in-stage reporting, requisition approvals, retention policies and an audit trail for the people who ask about them.
Open a requisition, publish to your careers page, and let sequences work the inbound and the referrals.
The stage sends the challenge, scores the submission and moves whoever clears the bar. No one triages a spreadsheet.
Book the loop, collect blind scorecards, and read one rollup that says where the candidate stands and who is blocking it.
Send the offer from the same record, then track the placement — and the commission, if you're billing for it.
Set the mode per organization. The pipeline, the assessments and the scorecards are identical — what changes is who the candidate belongs to and what happens when they're hired.
You're hiring for your own team. Requisitions, approvals and headcount are the spine.
You're placing engineers with clients. Customers, submissions and commission are the spine.
One plan, one price, locked for 24 months. In exchange we ask for your logo, a testimonial once it's earned, and a monthly call where you tell us what's wrong. There is no free tier and no tier matrix — that ladder ships once there are enough customers to segment.
We're taking three to five teams who will actually use it weekly — with a written usage expectation and a conversion price agreed before you start. You get the roadmap on speed dial. We get the truth.
Apply as a design partnerTwo commitments we'll hold you to when the full pricing ladder lands: compliance features are what you pay more for, never the daily workflow — and assessments stay unlimited on every paid plan, forever.
A real person reads every one of these. Say roughly how many engineers you hire a year and what you're using today — we'll come back with whether we're a fit, and say so plainly if we're not.